All Articles

Initialising Business Objects, The Better Way

When you’re writing server side scripts, they are of course written in JS. This means you’re able to use some of the shorter forms of initialising Business Objects just like you do in JS in other contexts such as in the browser (e.g.: CSHS) and Node.js.

The Standard Way

This is the way you’re taught to work with business objects:

tw.local.myNvp = new tw.object.NameValuePair() = 'foo'
tw.local.myNvp.value = 'bar'

There’s nothing actually wrong about this simple example. It’s only a few lines and it’s obvious what it’s doing.

But what about this one:

tw.local.myObject = new tw.object.MySpecialObject()
tw.local.myObject.myNumber = 123
tw.local.myObject.myString = 'hi'
tw.local.myObject.myObject = new tw.object.NameValuePair() = 'foo'
tw.local.myObject.myObject.value = 'bar'
tw.local.myObject.myList = new tw.object.listOf.ComplexObject()
tw.local.myObject.myList[0] = new tw.object.ComplexObject()
tw.local.myObject.myList[0].keyPair = new tw.object.NameValuePair()
tw.local.myObject.myList[0] = 'Toast'
tw.local.myObject.myList[0].keyPair.value = 'Bread'

Now, this is getting a little hard to read and hard to refactor. So how should you be doing it instead?

Initialising Objects

You can initialise any regular business object (except Map, ANY) with just the JS object literal syntax:

tw.local.myObject = {}

If you want to write values to properties, it’s exactly as you expect (note this is the short form of the first example):

tw.local.myNvp = {
    name: 'foo',
    value: 'bar'

All the properties of the objects you don’t provide values for remain undefined.

Initialising Lists

And similarly with lists, you can initialise them with arrays:

Instead of this:

tw.local.myList = new tw.object.listOf.MyObject()

You can do just this:

tw.local.myList = []

And to assign values, you can also combine it with the above:

tw.local.myListOfMyObjects = [{
    myNum: 123,
    myString: '123'
}, {
    myNum: 321,
    myString: '321'


  • You cannot initialise lists of Integer, Decimal, or Boolean. You will get an error like this:

    Type mismatch. Value “org.mozilla.javascript.NativeArray@eee2edf1” must be array. Java class found: org.mozilla.javascript.NativeArray

    You’ll have to initialise these the old fashioned way:

    tw.local.myListOfDecimals = new tw.object.listOf.Decimal() 
  • You cannot mix TW objects and native JS objects when assigning. I’ve personally not run into this very much.

    tw.local.myObject = {
        myNvp: tw.local.myInputNvp

    You will get an error like:

    The conversion of obj org.mozilla.javascript.NativeObject to TWObject is not valid.

    If you have to do this, you’ll have to break it down like so.

    tw.local.myObject = {
        myNvp: {
            value: tw.local.myInpupNvp.value,

    The same applies for dates. You can use a normal JS date or convert your TW date into a JS date if you must use this syntax:

    tw.local.myObject = {
        aDate: tw.local.someDate.toNativeDate()

    However, you can use the literal array syntax with TW types inside it:

    tw.local.myNvp = new tw.object.NameValuePair()
    tw.local.myNvps = [tw.local.myNvp]
  • You will lose out on autocomplete for objects inside the braces. The editors won’t be able to suggest property or method names when you’re editing. And in the same way, it won’t be able to suggest when you type a property name wrong. This shouldn’t stop you from writing the code above, as the benefits you get from readability greatly outweigh the few extra seconds it takes you to screenshot or remember the object structure.

Usage examples

  • When you’ve got a JS object converted from a JSON string via JSON.parse

    tw.local.myObject = JSON.parse(tw.local.jsonStr)

    Instead of:

    var sourceObject = JSON.parse(tw.local.jsonStr)
    tw.local.myObject = new tw.object.MySpecialObject()
    tw.local.myObject.myNumber = sourceObject.someNumber
    tw.local.myObject.myString = sourceObject.someString
    tw.local.myObject.myObject = new tw.object.NameValuePair() = sourceObject.someObject.key
    tw.local.myObject.myObject.value = sourceObject.someObject.value
  • It’s easier to use native JS methods than using the more limited methods on TW objects or lists.

    For example you’re mapping data from an integration call:

    var data = tw.local.returnData
    var outputData = []
    for (var i = 0; i < data.listLength; i++) {
            prop1: data.fooProp,
            prop2: data.barProp
    tw.local.myList = outputData

    I would prefer to write this as:

    tw.local.myList = tw.local.returnData.listToNativeArray().map(function (item) {
        return {

    Much better.

Wrapping things up

JavaScript in BPM is just like the JavaScript used elsewhere (albeit a little older than the browser JS). The key thing to understand is how the ‘native’ JS objects interact with the ‘TeamWorks’ types (which are mapped to Java objects).

If you find yourself writing more than a few lines of code handling TW objects, you might find it’s easier to simply work in native JS and then at the very end, assigning it once to the TW object.